MikeB Wx - 33andrain Jump to content

MikeB Wx

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

138 Excellent

Social Info


About MikeB Wx

  • Rank
    Advanced Member
  • Birthday 05/18/2001

Personal Information

  • Location
    North Massapequa, New York

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Onto the next one!!!
  2. MikeB Wx

    Banter Thread: Winter 2018-19 Edition

    As much as I hate to say it. I think it’s time to tap out. Happy tracking everyone I’ll be back around next storm.
  3. That’s with Philly,NYC,Bos not even being in the mix here. Imagine when we do get one ripping up the coast.
  4. FV3 has it as well but a cutter.
  5. Seems odd to me. Didn’t notice this before but the northern Vort is stronger and more closed off this run. That could be it. Defiantly don’t want to see that as we need a phase. But it’s encouraging to see the votes are much closer to eachother. But it doesn’t help that the N piece is stronger and closed off.
  6. Not sure what you see here but this looks better to me. Looks like a slightly stronger ridge out west. Faster northern Vort likely a faster phase and confluence looks a tad weaker and further east.
  7. I wonder if that’ll be worth much *narrorator* it was not worth much
  8. MikeB Wx

    Banter Thread: Winter 2018-19 Edition

    Currently me
  9. 18z GFS more of the same. This time goes towards the NAM with less confluence but now we have little to no phasing to turn this up the coast. Not giving up yet but seeing every model run come in and the fact that we have yet to see ONE MODEL show a decent hit in NYC makes continuing onward disheartening.
  10. I know its the 84 hour NAM but check out the Hudson Bay on the GFS vs the NAM for 6z Sunday. That energy is the confluence that may end up shunting out storm out. The GFS has the confluence slower and farther south. The NAM has the confluence a good deal further north with a more favorable tilt as well as faster timing. NAM still is not that ideal solution for NYC but it's definitely a good deal closer than the OP models. But then again we are talking the max range NAM here. Also of note here the NAM looks more favorable for a clean phase than the GFS. Although the NAM is closed off, it has a slower storm and a faster northern vort. This slower albeit cleaner evolution could end up wasting some of our best dynamics, however that may need to be sacrificed if you want snow in NYC.
  11. We are getting into the timerabge today tomorrow and Friday where we need to see big changes. We want to at least hold our ground, bad move when we see things moving backwards.
  12. 00z EPS vs 12z EPS, losing hope now.
  13. UKMET And ECMWF combination are usually deadly accurate. Honestly I’m close to being ready to throw in the towel for much of anything from NYC on north if we don’t see rather drastic changes between tonight and tomorrow.
  14. But it looks like the storm and northern stream is more separated, making it harder to phase.